ineffable


2017 This page has evolved and moved here.


Notes, questions, ideas

[This page is in continuous flux] 

    2014.2.3

  1. Isn't a comprehensive aesthetic system more useful if it's components are clearly defined, systematic and self-referential?
  2. Doesn't a faint trace of the fundamental exist at the border of nothingness in the mind of the experiencer, the visionary, or the reader?
  3. 2014.1.31

  4. Doesn't philosophy deal with the questions that are unanswered by the scientific method?
  5. 2010.11.25

  6. If the position of time shifted slightly, would we see different gravity attributes?
  7. What if the properties of gravity are linked to mass and specific to Earth-time physics? And what if mass-less objects don't conform to earth Time physics?
  8. What if a Time shift changed the number of electrons in the atoms that had direct contact with a mass-less object?
  9. What if electromagnetism determines the attributes of mass and the magnetic variables determine a mass "product" and density specific to Earth's time "frame" only?
  10. What if a mass-less small particle existed and processes determine the mass attributes of an object as well as the gravity and time "frame" surrounding the object?
  11. What if an object with zero-density existed regardless of its size? What if it could be engineered using density processes that determine an object's actual mass? What would the absence of mass, energy, and gravity do to light?
  12. What if negative mass, negative energy and reversed gravity was possible?
  13. What happens to matter if you start manipulating polarity?
  14. What if small particle polarity  and behavior is key?
  15. What if a small distance modification between the nucleus and the orbit components of the atoms made a big difference in mass density?
  16. If the distance was great between the nucleus and orbiting parts, why is great? And how could it be modified?
  17. What if when the magnetic field's lines run at right angles to another electric field it alters the mass of the object? And what if that temporarily changes the small particle polarity, shape, amount, and other parameters?
  18. What medium carries the polarity properties of an object: gas, liquid metal, pressurized water?
  19. Would engineered negative mass with time displacement focused against Earth's mass physics cause repulsion of the objects? If so could it be engineered and tuned into a multi-system of objects?
  20. What if each side of the multi-system could be assigned different mass attributes? Could one side be repulsion against mass while the other sides are heavier mass?
  21. What if the sounds resulting from the density tuning of the multi-systems magnetism interferes with radio?
  22. What if combining the the mass multi-systems to move as one for efficiency purposes and to prevent interference with earth's gravity?
  23. What if the laws of gravity must remain constant for a specific time frame and only mass, density, polarity change for interaction with a specific mass density?
  24. What if crushed crystal insulators were used?
  25. 2010.11.23

  26. What if antigravity is really the search for how to create a condition without mass?
  27. What if the energy of the mass-less object is zero? (An object without mass?)
  28. What if the object without mass creates its own energy influences on whatever is in its sphere of influence?
  29. What if the time reference to the massless object is different (and faster) than our time?
  30. What if only one side of the object is massless? What if it isthe side having direct interaction with gravity as it enters or leaves earth's atmosphere and is repelling gravity?
  31. pondering negative mass, negative energy and gravity that is reversed
  32. What effect does the absence of mass, energy and gravity have on the light surrounding anobject?
  33. What if the solar system's motion interacts with the magnetics of the celestial body of the earth as well as our biology (like the Moon but thinking bigger; thinking solar system affects electromagnetism)
  34. revisit the natural dipole balance of the organs of the human body
  35. look at all of the phenomena regardless of how bizarre it appears to be and search for a consistent correlation within the phenomena
  36. remaining open to all possibilities rather than discarding the unusual in favor of of scientific theories that are acceptable by some of today's science communities
  37. 2010.11.14

  38. Is there a consistent correlation between the phenomena?
  39. What are the [electro]magnetic effects of the solar system on the earth?
  40. What are the [electro]magnetic effects of the solar system on the earth's biological entities?
  41. What if the solar system's motion interacts with the magnetics of the celestial body of the earth AND with the biology on earth. I'm wondering about the [electro]magnetic effects of the solar system as a cohesive unit rather than isolating the effects of the moon.
  42. What if antigravity is really the search for how to create a condition without mass?
  43. What if the energy of the mass-less object is zero? (An object without mass?)
  44. What if the object without mass creates its own energy influences on whatever is in its sphere of influence via invisible electromagnetic DNA strands that provide magnetic input to each cell?
  45. What if the time reference to the massless object is different (and faster) than earth Time physics?
  46. What if only one side of the object is massless? What if it is the side having direct interaction with gravity as it enters or leaves earth's atmosphere and is repelling gravity?
  47. pondering negative mass, negative energy and gravity that is reversed
  48. What effect does the absence of mass, energy and gravity have on the light surrounding anobject?
  49. What if scientists revisited and explored the natural dipole balance of the organs of the human body again?
  50. looking at all of the phenomena regardless of how bizarre it appears to be and searching for a consistent correlation within the phenomena
  51. remaining open to all possibilities rather than discarding the unusual in favor of scientific theories that are acceptable by some of today's science communities
  52. 2010.10.31

  53. how/what role do these play? integration of morphology, behavior, material and structure …auto/morphism, parallel/single-threaded,gradient/granular, invariance, a/symmetry
  54. what are the recurring shared patterns in different environments human, non-human/biological, technology/virtual, external/internal
  55. what is the epistemology of simulations & their consequences for materialist philosophy itself. (Delanda)
  56. truth of the relative versus the relativity of truth -Deleuze
  57. areabsolute universal laws local by-laws, valid in our cosmic region, but not applicable in other cosmic regions? (Rees)
  58. swarm intelligence
  59. how is there a correlation between technology/art/science and ego/id/superego and nano/micro/macro (respectively)? How/what is the role of the adjacent possible and autopoesis with these pov’s? Catalyst = creative energy (fertile)
  60. whattransforms or puts out of equilibrium one’s relations to one’s habits? produces becoming as experimentation? empowerment as transformative tool; the middleground between belonging and becoming; foster the milieu, the middle, the intersection
  61. how does the virtual possible work?
  62. where do natural laws come from and why do they have the form that they do?
  63. is our universe a component of a multiverse with unique natural laws?
  64. what is the ephemeral nature of electromagnetic fields, high level mathematics, speeds beyond human comprehension?
  65. How does disjunction become a synthesis: with representational thought, disjunction is not really a synthesis?
  66. How are distinct forms of realism favored against the dominant forms of idealism?
  67. How does speculative realism address intuition?
  68. Why/how does enunciative recursion begin from the actual, not the virtual?
  69. what is deleuzian ‘plane of consistency’ and does it require creative essence?
  70. what is constuctivist vitalism?